{"id":5368,"date":"2010-06-10T15:14:15","date_gmt":"2010-06-10T22:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/news\/?p=560"},"modified":"2010-06-10T15:14:15","modified_gmt":"2010-06-10T22:14:15","slug":"skylight-fall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/2010\/06\/10\/skylight-fall\/","title":{"rendered":"$2,650,000: 10 Year Old Boy Suffers A Traumatic Brain Injury After Falling Through Skylight; Settles for Over $2.5 Million"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/skylight-1.jpg\" alt=\"skylight-1\" width=\"214\" height=\"159\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-5549\"><strong>CASE DESCRIPTION<\/strong>: Plaintiff, Garrett P., age 10, by and through his guardian ad litem Mark P. filed a suit against the Defendants RAC Properties, et al., who were the building owners during that time.&nbsp; Mark P. suffered a life altering traumatic brain injury after falling through an allegedly defective skylight on RAC Properties premises.<\/p>\n<p>On May 3, 2007, Garrett P. was visiting Kenny\u2019s Music in Dana Point.&nbsp; The young boy made his way to the roof of the Defendants\u2019 building and up a staircase designed for roof access.&nbsp; The staircase to the roof was created, in part, for access to a rental unit that was owned and leased by the Defendants.&nbsp; Due to this fact, a walking path was created to the rental unit.&nbsp; In close proximity of the path, there is a free standing skylight separated by a railing, to Code, that created the path to the rental unit.&nbsp; The skylight itself had no protective enclosure surrounding the unit. Garrett P., a child, was attracted to the various items stored near the skylight including chairs, drawers, and tables.&nbsp; Mark makes his way to this area and accidently steps onto a flat portion of the skylight.&nbsp;&nbsp; Upon Garrett\u2019s encounter with the skylight, he looses his balance and falls right through, hitting his head on the ground.&nbsp; There were no direct eyewitnesses, but a retail tenant employee indicated that Garrett may have been jumping on the skylight.&nbsp; Subsequently, he suffered a traumatic brain injury from the fall.&nbsp; Plaintiff Garrett P. was initially treated at Children\u2019s Hospital of Orange County at Mission from May 3, 2007 to June 7, 2007.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/06\/skylight-2.jpg\" alt=\"skylight-2\" width=\"149\" height=\"202\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-5550\">Plaintiff contended that the skylight itself had no protective enclosure surrounding the unit.<\/p>\n<p>Garrett P. went to the roof of the defendants\u2019 building.&nbsp; Garrett was attracted to the various items stored near the skylight, inclusive of chairs, drawers and tables. Garrett made his way over to the skylight area and accidentally stepped on a portion of a flat skylight. Garrett\u2019s encounter with the skylight caused him to lose his balance and fall directly through the skylight.&nbsp; Garrett fell eleven (11) feet wherein his head struck concrete, causing a major head injury.<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff contended that the skylight was below the standard of care, based on building code violations, during the ownership of Ruth Clark, RAC Properties.&nbsp; Plaintiff\u2019s established through their use of experts that the skylight should have been able to withstand 400 pounds of weight.&nbsp; Yet, the skylight could obviously not sustain the weight of a 10-year-old boy. Therefore, the skylight did not meet the standard of care.<\/p>\n<p>Defendants contended that the building did meet proper building code standards.&nbsp; Defendants contended that the only way that a person could reach the skylight was to climb over a railing, that was indisputably to Code.&nbsp; Defendants contended that the skylight itself, thus, did not need further railing surrounding the unit.<\/p>\n<p>Defendants also contended that the mother of the Plaintiff was negligent for the incident.&nbsp; Defendants contended that the Plaintiff was autistic and had a pattern of erratic behavior prior to the incident.&nbsp; In addition, Plaintiff having this condition should not have been left unsupervised to climb to the top of the roof structure wherein the skylight was located.<\/p>\n<p><strong>RESULT<\/strong>:&nbsp; $2,650,000<\/p>\n<p><strong>SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS<\/strong>: The matter was settled after a mediation session in front of Jay Horton at Judicate West.<\/p>\n<p><strong>TYPE OF CASE<\/strong>:&nbsp; Premises Liability; Personal Injury; Products Liability<\/p>\n<p><strong>INJURIES<\/strong>: Garrett Poore, now age twelve (12), has suffered a variety of injuries, including, but not limited to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Traumatic brain injury;<\/li>\n<li>Occipital and parietal scalp hematomas;<\/li>\n<li>Right parietal nondisplaced skull fracture (depressed per Dr. ?)<\/li>\n<li>Right temporal bone fracture extending to the vertex of the right parietal calvarium;<\/li>\n<li>Right parietal subdural hematoma (small right lateral)<\/li>\n<li>Right parietal subarachnoid hematoma (small, posterior temporal\/anterior parietal)<\/li>\n<li>Cerebral contusions (right parietal; small right cerebellar)<\/li>\n<li>Petechial hemorrhages<\/li>\n<li>Diffuse axonal injury<\/li>\n<li>Grade I and II bed ulcers<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>DATE &amp; LOCATION OF INCIDENT<\/strong>: May 3, 2007 at about 4:30 p.m. Dana Point, California<\/p>\n<p><strong>PLAINTIFF\u2019S AGE<\/strong>: 10 years old<\/p>\n<p><strong>OCCUPATION<\/strong>:&nbsp;Elementary school student<\/p>\n<p><strong>PLAINTIFF\u2019S ATTORNEYS<\/strong>:<br \/>\nChristopher R. Aitken<br \/>\nAITKEN * AITKEN * COHN<br \/>\nFor Plaintiff Garrett P.,a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Mark P.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DEFENDANT\u2019S ATTORNEYS<\/strong>:<br \/>\nMonica Cruz Thornton, Esq.<br \/>\nSELMAN &amp; BREITMAN, LLP<br \/>\nFor Defendant RAC ENTERPRISES, LLC; RAC PROPERTIES, L.P. and RUTH ANN CLARK<\/p>\n<p><strong>DEFENDANT INSURANCE CO<\/strong>.: Evinstan Insurance and CNA Insurance<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CASE DESCRIPTION: Plaintiff, Garrett P., age 10, by and through his guardian ad litem Mark P. filed a suit against the Defendants RAC Properties, et al., who were the building owners during that time.&nbsp; Mark P. suffered a life altering traumatic brain injury after falling through an allegedly defective skylight on RAC Properties premises. On&#8230; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/2010\/06\/10\/skylight-fall\/\">read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[699],"class_list":["post-5368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-verdicts-settlements","tag-serious-personal-injury"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aitkenlaw.com\/newsite\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}